Member Login


Admin Login

Not a member yet? Sign Up!

The newest updates:

At 2021-11-02 20:28:57,
page000
Paula Noronen Yökoulun Pieni Kauhukäsikirja kuvitus  Kati Närhi Tammi
... ...

At 2021-09-28 09:43:54,
page0013
Ruoka Kakkua pullaa, leipää ja 
... ...

At 2021-09-27 15:05:39,
page0012

... ...

At 2021-09-27 15:04:58,
page0011

... ...

At 2021-09-27 15:04:35,
page0010

... ...

At 2021-09-27 15:04:02,
page0009

... ...

At 2021-09-27 15:03:17,
page0008

... ...

At 2021-09-27 15:02:35,
page0007

... ...

At 2021-09-27 15:02:14,
page0006

... ...

At 2021-09-27 15:01:32,
page0005

... ...

At 2021-09-27 14:59:22,
page0000

... ...

At 2021-09-27 14:58:31,
page0000

... ...

At 2021-09-27 14:57:52,
page0000

... ...

At 2021-09-27 14:57:21,
page0000

... ...

At 2021-09-27 14:56:34,
page0000

... ...

by huiping.wu(at)hotmail.com

Comments

At 2021-05-29 23:29:38,
admin2020 says:
现在作为两个小家伙的语法素材来用。 ... more ...

At 2011-10-31 18:20:53,
admin2020 says:
大概是15年前的时候,我买了这本书. 在高中的时候,由于英语老师介绍说应该用英语去学习英语, 所以尝试着这么做。看似书面都破旧了,但是除了开头几页外,我又读了多少呢? ... more ...

At 2011-10-20 15:47:55,
admin2020 says:
"saw hermeneutics as a method for eliminating misunderstanding"Another contribution for Hermeneutics. ... more ...

At 2011-10-20 15:45:02,
admin2020 says:
One contribution of Hermeneutics :"from a theological to an academic practice "It serves as an academic practice. ... more ...

At 2011-10-20 15:39:28,
admin2020 says:
Here are three models:"With phenomenology, the problem centred on the notion of “intersubjectivity” and the extension of bodily experience beyond the individual’s perceptual realm. Structuralsim appeared to offer a social context for this experience, by embedding the individual in a network of pre-existing codes and conventions. At the same time, structuralist analysis failed to deal with historical change and the various brands of political criticism were shown ... more ...

At 2011-10-20 14:09:03,
admin2020 says:
"In Heidegger’s work, understanding became the basic mode of being, "I agree with this point. Failure of understanding causes so much conflicts and opposing grounds. ... more ...

At 2011-10-19 18:51:04,
admin2020 says:
" The transformation of hermeneutics from a theological to an academic practice"There is certain shift and change from traditional meaning of Hermeneutics into general meaning of interpretation. ... more ...

At 2011-10-19 18:31:36,
admin2020 says:
The first one is to consider architecture is a solution to the problem of practical spatial demands.The second one is to pursue the asthetical demands by architecture. ... more ...

At 2011-10-19 18:25:54,
admin2020 says:
"Chapters 1 and 2 of this book set out two contrasting schools of thought – two opposing views on the question of meaning in architecture. The first assumes that architecture has no meaning at all, except as a solution to the problem of providing convenient sheltered space. The second approaches architecture as a pure artistic exercise, with its priority to community a message rated above all other concerns."Here are the two basic frame of thought.  ... more ...

At 2011-10-19 18:21:53,
admin2020 says:
"Hermeneutics today is a problematic term because of its historical associations, but I am using it in the broadest sense to mean the general practice of interpretation."Hermeneutics has its tracks from "historical associations", in this book author uses this word as "the general practice of interpretation". ... more ...

At 2011-10-19 18:04:33,
admin2020 says:
" The critical element I have suggested in the title “critical hermeneutics” should serve to highlight a problem that will become apparent in the conventional understanding of the term. It is meant to suggest a certain vigilance towards the conservative tendencies of hermeneutics, and to restore the quality of questionableness with regard to historical traditions."does this clarify the meanings of Critical Hermeneutics and its contributions. ... more ...

At 2011-10-19 00:18:51,
admin2020 says:
"another factor, the idea of a tradition being formed by a shared community of understanding. "what is that factor? ... more ...

At 2011-10-18 23:28:23,
admin2020 says:
it seems that Hermeneutics is certain updates from , at least current definition, religion interpretations between Spiritual figures and expression to mortals.  ... more ...

At 2011-10-18 23:26:22,
admin2020 says:
"   Hermeneutics was born with the attempt to raise(Biblical) exegesis and (classical) philology to the level of a Kunstlehre, that is , a ‘technology’, which is not restricted to a mere collection of unconnected operations.3"this some kind of explanations of Hermeneutics, ... more ...

At 2011-10-18 23:21:10,
admin2020 says:
"The fact that texts require interpretation at all"---interpretation is the action in order to understand. ... more ...

1/11Go to Page:
Sorted by date

page106

from Nordic Architects Writes

Arrogance and even malignance towards more human discussion. “The architect firmly believes that the drawing speaks for itself and the drawing says it all”, the wrote. In Pietilä’s opinion, the ruling dictum in 1960s architecture that “good architecture must contain no aesthetics or theory of any kind” was also an obstacle to architects writing. Pietilä saw the prevailing conflict in values between the realist and the theorist that existed in Finland in those days – and perhaps still does – as extremely significant. “The realist is a good man, the theorist a bad one”, wrote Pietilä and went on to say that the reason for fear was concealed in the doggerel that “those who can’t design buildings prefer to write journals. Thus the fact that a man finds writing unpleasant means that he must be a good architect”. Pietilä was at his most cutting when talking about the arrogance of architects:

         Architecture is so elevated, so exalted, as to be almost unattainable. Architecture is an extremely difficult and therefore an incomprehensible issue, an issue that the layman is never capable of approaching in the right way … It is dangerous to explain the nature of architecture to “the people” and this undoubtedly leads to a false simplicity. The calling of architecture demands acquiescence, humility and worship from those who practice it.4

         Pietilä’s analysis provides an interesting context for the Finnish texts selected for this book. They are fine pieces of writing from a country that produces fine architecture, and yet there is a delightfully perplexing common denominator which makes them so easily recognizable as Finnish. Each one of them has been written by an architect who has shown great practical design ability and attained great respect in Finland and even abroad. Each of the texts ponders the nature of architecture and describes architecture as one complete indivisible and perhaps slightly mystical profession of artistic talent. All the texts are, in a way, frozen still-lifes in words: they are favourable portraits of architecture written as if under an obligation. They are not a matter of debate for its own sake, but tokens of faith.

         Historically, the first of the texts is Eliel Saarinen’s “Address”, a speech given in his capacity as president of the Cranbrook Academy of Arts at the annual general meeting of the American Institute of Architects.5 Saarinen had moved from Finland to the United States in 1923 after winning second prize in the international architectural competition for a skyscraper for the Chicago Tribune newspaper. Earlier, in collaboration with his student colleagues and partner Hermann Gesellius and Armas Lindgren, he had attained an important role as someone who had genuinely shown the way in a nation sense. This era had come to an end, however:6 what was needed when he wrote the speech was a new vision, new integrity and consistency, rationalism and modern architecture.

         Perplexingly enough, both the setting and the agenda echo the heated debate that had been sparked off early in the twentieth century after Saarinen had won the two major competitions for the National Museum (1902) and Helsinki Railway Station (1904). Then, the opposition to Saarinen consisted of the pioneers of Finnish Modernism, Gustaf Strengell (1878-1938) and Sigurd Frosterus (1876-1956) to whom architecture was not an independent artistic issue but quite the opposite: “Architecture is – or at least should be – linked firmly with life, and interact with




Share to International sites:
Bookmark and Share
分享到国内网站和微博
分享道