Sorted by date | |||
Messagefrom General Critics" The transformation of hermeneutics from a theological to an academic practice" There is certain shift and change from traditional meaning of Hermeneutics into general meaning of interpretation.
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Messagefrom General CriticsThe first one is to consider architecture is a solution to the problem of practical spatial demands. The second one is to pursue the asthetical demands by architecture.
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Messagefrom General Critics"Chapters 1 and 2 of this book set out two contrasting schools of thought – two opposing views on the question of meaning in architecture. The first assumes that architecture has no meaning at all, except as a solution to the problem of providing convenient sheltered space. The second approaches architecture as a pure artistic exercise, with its priority to community a message rated above all other concerns." Here are the two basic frame of thought.
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Messagefrom General Critics"Hermeneutics today is a problematic term because of its historical associations, but I am using it in the broadest sense to mean the general practice of interpretation." Hermeneutics has its tracks from "historical associations", in this book author uses this word as "the general practice of interpretation".
|
|||
|
|||
|
|||
Messagefrom General Critics" The critical element I have suggested in the title “critical hermeneutics” should serve to highlight a problem that will become apparent in the conventional understanding of the term. It is meant to suggest a certain vigilance towards the conservative tendencies of hermeneutics, and to restore the quality of questionableness with regard to historical traditions." does this clarify the meanings of Critical Hermeneutics and its contributions.
|
|||
|
|||
|